State v. McDaniel’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

38 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““If the verdict or finding is guilty, upon request of the victim or the victim’s family and before imposing sentence, the court shall hold a hearing to establish restitution. The defendant may waive the right to the hearing and accept the amount of restitution as established by the court. If the court orders restitution to be paid to the victim or the victim’s family, the order shall be enforced as a judgment of restitution pursuant to K.S.A. 60-4301 through 60-4304.””

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Hannebohn · State v. Martin

2. ““Although it may have been better practice for tire district judge to wait until the later [restitution] hearing to conclude his usual sentencing colloquy, and he erred in reciting a deadline for notice of appeal that fell between the first and second hearings, we see no prejudice to [the defendant’s] rights.” (Emphasis added.) 292 Kan. at 448 .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Hannebohn

3. “Restitution is one of the dispositions authorized by K.S.A. 21-4603d, and it therefore constitutes part of a criminal defendant's sentence.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Marinelli