Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 292 Md. 97 - In Re Randolph T.

In Re Randolph T.’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
October 1984
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Gault · Addington v. Texas · Kent v. United States · Woodby v. Immigration & Naturalization Service

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he individual should not be asked to share equally with society the risk of error when the possible injury to the individual is signifi cantly greater than any possible harm to the state.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Most courts which have considered this issue have adopted the preponderance of the evidence standard of persuasion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.