Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 292 Minn. 505 - State v. Cormican

State v. Cormican’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
August 1982
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Hubbard · State v. Dax · State v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Defendant was here charged with operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an alcoholic beverage rather than being ‘in actual physical control’ thereof. There was no evidence indicating that the officers observed defendant ‘operating’ the truck. The evidence was uncontroverted that defendant’s truck had been moved by the informants from a position on the highway, where it may have been under the control of defendant, to the shoulder, where it was found by the arresting officers. Under those circumstances the arrest was improper.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.