Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

292 N.C. 379

In re Stuhl

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 14, 1977

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1977-04-14

Relies on In the Matter of Crutchfield

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1977-04-14

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 2018

10 state decisions

3019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Justice Lake

¶1dissenting.

¶2I dissent for the reasons stated by me in my dissenting opinion in In re Crutchfield, 289 N.C. 597, 605, 223 S.E. 2d 822 (1976). This dissent is in no way intended as a condonation of any of the alleged conduct in office of the respondent or is it intended to imply that such conduct, if it occurred, is not prejudicial to the administration of justice or that it does not bring the judicial office into disrepute. My dissent is based solely upon what I consider the obvious unconstitutionality of the statute pursuant to which the Judicial Standards Commission operates and from which the jurisdiction of this Court in this proceeding is purportedly derived.

/292/nc/379 · .json · Public domain