¶1Danny Lilly, in pro. per.
¶2Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., James E. Scarbrough, Associate Atty., for the State.
¶3Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 32 N.C.App. 467, 232 S.E.2d 495. Denied.
292 N.C. 643
235 S.E.2d 64
STATE of North Carolina v. Danny LILLY.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided May 3, 1977.
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1977-05-03
Relies on 32 N.C. App. 467 - State v. Lilly
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1977-05-03
Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently August 2011 · most notably State v. Hageman (1982), State v. Rasor (1987)
34 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Danny Lilly, in pro. per.
¶2Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., James E. Scarbrough, Associate Atty., for the State.
¶3Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 32 N.C.App. 467, 232 S.E.2d 495. Denied.