Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 292 NJSUPER 151 - In re R.C.

In re R.C.’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2001
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Churchdale Leasing, Inc. · State v. A.N.J. · State v. ANJ · 240 N.J. Super. 216 - State v. HJB · 286 N.J. Super. 82 - In re the Expungement of the Criminal Record of M.D.Z.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In all cases, except as herein provided, wherein a person has been convicted of a crime under the laws of this State and who has not been convicted of any prior or subsequent crime, whether within this State or any other jurisdiction, and has not been adjudged a disorderly person or petty disorderly person on more than two occasions may after the expiration of a period of 10 years from the date of his conviction ... present a duly verified petition ... praying that such conviction and all records and information pertaining thereto be expunged. [ N.J.S.A. 2C:52-2a.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[the laws relating to expungement] shall be construed with the primary objective of providing relief to the one-time offender who has led a life of rectitude and disassociated himself with unlawful activity, but not to create a system whereby periodic violators of the law or those who associate themselves with criminal activity have a regular means of expunging their police and criminal records.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) [m]arijuana, where the total quantity sold, distributed or possessed with intent to sell was 25 grams or less, or (2)[h]ashish, where the total quantity sold, distributed or possessed with intent to sell was five grams or less”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.