292 N.J. Super. 391 - Singer v. Commodities Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently April 2010 · most notably Martindale v. Sandvik, Inc. (2002), Young v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America, Inc. (1997)
30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 9 U.S.C. § 1 (Federal Arbitration Act) · 9 U.S.C. § 2
Relies on Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp. · United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · Landgraf v. USI Film Products · First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. Kaplan · Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[a] clause depriving a citizen of access to the courts should clearly state its purpose.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“] is neither unfair nor inequitable and does not deprive plaintiff of any fundamental or substantive rights,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“well-accepted principle that New Jersey supports the settlement of disputes by arbitration,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.