Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 292 NW2D 798 - Lodermeier v. State

Lodermeier v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 1982
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boykin v. Alabama · United States v. Woodall · Roberts v. Greenway · Bailey v. Baker · Lodermeier v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Courts earnestly pursuing reality would be hard put to justify a rule that would allow a defendant... to assert that his solemn pleas of guilty were negated for lack of accurate information of sentence consequences, then permit him to run a procedural trap play that would block the development of the plain truth which shows his own attorney told him exactly what he could expect. Not only does this specious sophistry fail to protect confidential relationships, it trifles with the truth—it scoffs at justice—and we reject it flatly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.