Callery v. Lyons’s Empirical Analysis
1944
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
May 1966
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"It was not essential that anyone should say to defendant in specific words that he would not be held liable on the said note. George v. Bacon, 138 App.Div. 208, 209, 210 , 123 N.Y.S. 103 . If upon the whole record the jury were justified in concluding that such an agreement was made or that such an understanding existed, plaintiffs could not recover upon his indorsement."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Culberson v. Hawkins“* * * that there was an understanding or agreement, express or implied, that, as between defendant and the payees, there would be no liability of the former to the latter because of such indorsement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Culberson v. Hawkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.