State v. Stringer’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 1990
most recently cited
2 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Freeman v. Zahradnick · United States v. Amaral · Myers v. Cessna Aircraft Corporation · Ritter v. BEALS · 53 Ill. 2d 56 - McGrath v. Rohde
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen the evidence upon which an expert bases his opinion is contradicted by the other evidence, the jury determines which evidence is to be accepted as correct and judges the credibility of the expert's testimony accordingly”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Nefstad“is not whether a jury is capable of drawing its own inferences from the evidence presented. Rather, the test is whether the expert's testimony, if believed, will be of help or assistance to the jury.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.