Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 292 SO2D 432 - Mann v. State

Mann v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
January 1995
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently January 1995

9 state decisions

50197419801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Jeffers · United States v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"* * * At the outset, the Assistant State Attorney announced that the defendant had the burden with respect to his motion and the Assistant Public Defender concurred. Thus, it would appear that the entire hearing was held under the misapprehension that the defendant had the burden of proof with respect to the legality of the warrantless search."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “ultimate burden of proof as to the validity of a warrantless search is on the State.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “The testimony concerning the legality of the search is inconclusive.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.