292 So. 2d 7 - Reed v. State’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(T)he retention of separate filings . . . after these groupings have lost their validity as factors in jury selection, represents a lack of efficiency, but does not represent a constitutional error. Such separate groupings should be abandoned, but there has been no showing that the intent or result of such groupings has been the establishment of a set ratio of members of these classes in the jury selection process . . .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Reed v. Wainwright

2. “" Fla. Stat. § 40.01 , F.S.A., provides regulation of the process of jury selection which is not, per se, violative of any provision of the Constitution of Florida or of the United States. Nor has the selection of jurors in Dade County created any constitutional infirmity."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 306 So. 2d 513 - Wilson v. State

3. “Grand and petit jurors shall be taken from the male and female persons at least 18 years of age, . .. .”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 347 So. 2d 610 - State v. Rodgers