292 U.S. 610
Docket No. 1025.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdictional statement submitted May 12, 1934.
Decided May 21, 1934.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1934-05-21
Cited by 2 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1935
1 counsel of record
Relies on Hebert v. State of Louisiana · Enterprise Irrigation District v. Farmers Mutual Canal Co. · American Railway Express Co. v. Kentucky
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1934-05-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶2The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Fisher v. New Orleans, 218 U.S. 438, 440; Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 *611U.S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157, 165, 166; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 316, 317; American Ry. Express Co. v. Kentucky, 273 U.S. 269, 272, 273.
¶3Mr. Ewing D. Colvin for appellant. Mr. John J. Sullivan for appellee.