292 U.S. 614
Docket No. 1064.
Supreme Court of the United States
Jurisdictional statement submitted May 26, 1934.
Decided June 4, 1934.
Supreme Court of the United States · decided 1934-06-04
1 counsel of record
Relies on Mugler v. State of Kansas State of Kansas Tufts · Morrison v. People of State of California · Casey v. United States
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1934-06-04
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently August 1985
5 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Messrs. Frank L. Johnson and Daniel W. Iddings for appellant. No appearance for appellee.
¶3The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Morrison v. California, 291 U.S. 82, 88-91; Casey v. United States, 276 U.S. 413, 418; Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U.S. 623, 674.