Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 A2D 780 - State v. Cookson

State v. Cookson’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
August 2010
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Saba · Commonwealth v. Tilley · State v. Smith · People v. Young · 38 Wash. 2d 446 - State v. Rio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It appears clear that the offense of burglary is one primarily against the security of the habitation. It marks the state’s determination to safeguard in his dwelling the homeowner, his family and guests from the dangers that accompany felonious invasions of their sanctuaries during the particularly vulnerable periods of darkness, (footnote omitted.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““mere abstract principles of law, although correct, should not be given unless they are applicable to the facts in evidence”, State v. Cookson, Me., 293 A.2d 780, 782 (1972),”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.