Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 Ala. 525 - Carter v. Stringfellow

Carter v. Stringfellow’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
September 2012
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently September 2012

20 state decisions

6019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Collins v. Alabama Power Co. · Roberts v. Monroe · Hicks Bros. v. Swift Creek Mill Co. · Scheuer v. Britt · Burroughs v. Pate

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘ * * * An essential element of an es-toppel in pais is a false representation, or a concealment of material facts, upon which another has been induced to act to his prejudice. The representation or concealment must, in all ordinary cases, have reference to past or present facts. A mere promise of something to be done in the future is not such a representation or concealment. One’s failure to perform a promise is a very different thing from his denial of a state of facts which he had previously held out as in existence.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that the [fee] owner of a servient estate may himself use the land upon which an easement has been dedicated so long as such right does not conflict with the purpose and character of the easement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “A permanent easement or incumbrance on lands must rest on something more enduring than the memory of witnesses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.