Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 ARK 171 - Tackett v. Robbs

Tackett v. Robbs’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 1991
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Arkansas Savings & Loan Ass'n Board v. Corning Savings & Loan Ass'n · 3-W Lumber Co. v. Housing Authority · Tulio v. Arkansas Blue Cross & Blue Shield, Inc. · Sherman v. G & H TRANSPORTATION, INC. · Dhanani Investments, Inc. v. Second Master Bilt Homes, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When multiple parties are involved, or where more than one claim is presented, the trial court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the parties and claims only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon the express direction for the entry of the judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.