Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 ARK 479 - Bruce v. Dillahunty

Bruce v. Dillahunty’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
July 1990
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Verser v. Ford · 69 Ohio App. 442 - French v. Catholic Community League · Tucker v. Turner · Combs v. Edmiston · A. v. B.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) A consent to adoption cannot be withdrawn after the entry of a decree of adoption. (b) A consent to adoption may be withdrawn prior to the entry of a decree of adoption if the court finds, after notice and opportunity to be heard is afforded to petitioner, the person seeking the withdrawal, and the agency placing a child for adoption, that the withdrawal is in the best interest of the individual to be adopted and the court orders the withdrawal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.