Torzillo v. Goldmann

Third Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued June 9,1961.

Decided Aug. 1, 1961.

Third Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1961-08-01

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently August 1961

1 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on 61 N.J. Super. 253 - State v. Torzillo · Torzillo v. Goldmann

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1961-08-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Louis Torzillo, pro se.

¶2David D. Furman, Atty. Gen. of New Jersey, Theodore I. Botter, Asst. Atty. Gen., of New Jersey, for appellee.

¶3Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and HASTIE and FORMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5We have examined carefully the record in this case and have considered the arguments of the parties. A cogent explanation of the relevant circumstances is contained in the opinion of the defendants in State v. Torzillo, 1960, 61 N.J.Super. 253, 160 A.2d 511, and in that of Judge Meaney in the court below in the instant case. We can perceive no valid basis for Torzillo’s complaint that his civil rights have been violated in breach of R.S.1979, Section 1 of the Civil Rights Act of April 20, 1871, 17 Stat. 13, 42 U.S.C.A. § 1983, or that he was denied any right guaranteed to him by the Fourteenth Amendment. Accordingly the judgment will be affirmed, D.C., 190 F.Supp. 504.