Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

293 F.2d 519

Docket No. 16229.

Lancaster v. United States

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued May 12, 1961.

Decided June 15, 1961.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1961-06-15

2 counsel of record

Relies on Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKey · Preston v. Texas · D'Aquino v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1961-06-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1986

7 federal appellate ·

60196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Mr. Maurice R. Weeks, Washington, D. C., for appellant.

Mr. Nathan J. Paulson, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty. at the time the brief was filed, and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U. S. Atty. at the time the brief was filed, were on the brief, for appellee. Messrs. David C. Acheson, now U. S. Atty., and Donald S. Smith, Asst. U. S. Atty., also entered appearances for appellee.

Before WILBUR K. MILLER, Chief Judge, and EDGERTON and BURGER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Appellant was convicted of violating the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2421, and possessing obscene pictures with intent to exhibit them. D.C.Code (1951) § 22-2001. When an alleged obscene film was shown in court, the public except newspaper reporters were excluded. There was other evidence. Appellant's right to a public trial was not denied. Gillars v. United States, 87 U.S.App. D.C. 16, 31, 182 F.2d 962, 977; Iva Ikuko Toguri D'Aguino v. United States, 9 Cir., 192 F.2d 338, 365, certiorari denied, 343 U.S. 935, 72 S.Ct. 772, 96 L.Ed. 1343, rehearing denied, 345 U.S. 931, 72 S.Ct. 1053, 96 L.Ed. 1358.

¶2

Affirmed.

/293/f2d/519 · .json · Public domain