Hooker v. Mullin’s Empirical Analysis
293 F.3d 1232 · 2002
Citation profile
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2020
11 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Estelle v. McGuire · Kimmelman v. Morrison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hooper v. Mullin“court cannot deny a defendant's request for a lesser included offense jury instruction on the basis that the defendant claims he is innocent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.