Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 F.3d 1254 - McCormick v. Aderholt

McCormick v. Aderholt’s Empirical Analysis

293 F.3d 1254 · 2002

Citation profile

70
cited by 70 later decisions
February 2023
most recently cited

26 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably Cook Estate of Tessier v. Sheriff of Monroe County Florida (2005), Molinos Valle Del Cibao, C. por A. v. Lama (2011)

26 federal appellate ·

450200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bonner v. City of Prichard · Thompson v. United States · Smith v. Gte Corporation Gte · Rex Morrison Harold Highley v. Allstate Indemnity Company Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company · Mas v. Perry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the party invoking the court's jurisdiction bears the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, facts supporting the existence of federal jurisdiction.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`if we are left with a substantial and eradicable doubt as to whether the jury was properly guided in its deliberations.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Citizenship is equivalent to ‘domicile’ for purposes of diversity jurisdiction.” McCormick v. Aderholt, 293 F.3d 1254, 1257 (11th Cir.2002) (citation omitted). There is a presumption”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.