Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

293 F.3d 237

Docket No. 00-40034.

United States v. Fox

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 31, 2002.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2002-05-31

2 counsel of record

Relies on Ashcroft Attorney General v. Free Speech Coalition · Macklin v. City of New Orleans

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2002-05-31

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently March 2020

1 state decisions

80200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1David Haskell Henderson, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Beaumont, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

¶2Bruce Wayne Cobb, Conley, Schexnaider & Associates, Beaumont, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

¶4ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

¶5Before WIENER and STEWART, Circuit Judges, and SMITH,* District Judge.

¶6BY THE COURT:

¶7The Supreme Court of the United States, by order in No. 01-805, George Ervin Fox v. United States, — U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1602, 152 L.Ed.2d 617 (2002), granted appellant’s petition for a writ of certiorari, vacated the judgment (conviction and sentence) in the case, and remanded it to us for further consideration in light of Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 1389, 152 L.Ed.2d 403 (2002).

¶8IT IS ORDERED that the captioned case be and it is hereby remanded to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas for further proceedings and disposition consistent with the aforesaid order of the Supreme Court.

/293/f3d/237 · .json · Public domain