Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 F.3d 641 - Smith v. Mensinger

Smith v. Mensinger’s Empirical Analysis

293 F.3d 641 · 2002

Citation profile

180
cited by 180 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
2
states following
February 2024
most recently cited

15 federal appellate · 26 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 180 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2024 · most notably Wilkins v. Gaddy (2010), Mitchell v. Horn (2003)

15 federal appellate · 26 district · 2 state decisions

1160200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Sandin v. Conner · Hudson v. McMillian · V. C O Churner · Rode v. Dellarciprete

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 180 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “an officer is only liable if there is a realistic and reasonable opportunity to intervene.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a reasonable opportunity to intervene and simply refused to do so.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(1) “the need for the application of force”; (2) “the relationship between the need and the amount of force that was used”; (3) “the extent of injury inflicted”; (4) “the extent of the threat to the safety of staff and inmates, as reasonably perceived by responsible officials on the basis of the facts known to them”; and (5) “any efforts made to temper the severity of a forceful response.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.