Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

293 F.3d 760

Docket No. 99-60349.

Ramsay v. Omnibank

Full caption · 2 consolidated cases

  • Georgia RAMSAY, et alv.OMNIBANK, et al
  • Omnibank, Defendant-Third Partyv.United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Third Party

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 2002-06-06

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2017

5 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Estelle v. McGuire

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 2002-06-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Sam Starnes Thomas, Heidelberg & Woodliff, Jackson, MS, for Omnibank.

W. Shan Thompson, Charles G. Copeland (argued), Copeland, Cook, Taylor & Bush, Ridgeland, MS, for United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi; Walter J. Gex, III, Judge.

Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

In this case we certified a question to the Supreme Court of Mississippi, asking:

¶2

Whether an insurer's duty to defend under a general commercial liability policy for injuries caused by accidents extends, under Mississippi law, to injuries unintended by the insured but which resulted from intentional actions of the insured if those actions were negligent but not intentionally tortious.1

¶3

The details of the case are set out both in our certification2 and the Mississippi Supreme Court's answer.3 Since it is now clear that, under Mississippi law, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. had no duty to defend Omnibank from the underlying suit,4 we must REVERSE and REMAND for entry of summary judgment in favor of USF&G.

¶4

REVERSED and REMANDED.

Notes:

2

Id. at 502-03.

3

United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Omnibank, 812 So.2d 196, 197-98 (Miss.2002).

4

Id. at 202.

/293/f3d/760 · .json · Public domain