293 F. Supp. 2d 328 - Tsabbar v. Booth’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1021 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 241 (Church Arson Prevention Act of 1996) · 26 U.S.C. § 216 · 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))
Relies on Haines v. Kerner · Bernheim v. Litt · Pani v. Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield · Boddie v. Schnieder · Anita Lerman Angelo D'Angelo v. Board of Elections in the City of New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“to the extent [p]laintiff's claims seek injunctive and declaratory relief (against the [Justices] in either their official or individual capacities), the Rooker-Feldman doctrine is a barrier.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Tsabbar v. Booth, 293 F.Supp.2d 328, 335 (S.D.N.Y.2003) (citing Sundwall v. Leuba, No. 00 Civ. 1309, 2001 WL 58834 , at - (D.Conn. Jan. 23, 2001)). Under this doctrine,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“federal review, if any, can occur only by way of a certiorari petition to the Supreme Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.