Teasley v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
September 2022
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Bruton v. United States · Jackson v. Denno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'In reviewing a ruling on the admissibility of a defendant's statements where the facts are disputed, we accept the trial court's factual findings and credibility determinations unless they are clearly erroneous, but we independently apply the law to the facts.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rhynes v. State“Thus, even if [Davis] had testified similarly at the Jackson-Denno hearing, the trial court's ruling admitting his statement would have been the same and would be upheld on appeal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DAVIS v. the STATE.“[P]retermitting whether trial counsel was deficient ... in not calling him as a witness, [Davis] has shown no prejudice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. DAVIS v. the STATE.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.