Durden v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
October 2019
most recently cited
19 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Harris v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“‘[sjwabbing the hands of an accused to lift gunshot residue does not constitute an unconstitutional search or seizure!,]’ ” therefore a motion to suppress”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State“[T]he [prosecutor's] argument clearly did not inject facts not in evidence ... so OCGA § 17-8-75 is not applicable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Venturino v. State“statements of prejudicial matters which are not in evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Venturino v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.