Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 Ga. App. 193 - Williams v. State

293 Ga. App. 193 - Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2008

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Barker v. Wingo · 234 Ga. App. 633 - Short v. State · Drinkard v. Walker · Childs v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Wjhere the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the [required evidence test] is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not. As [the Supreme Court of Georgia] stated previously, a single act may be an offense against two statutes; and if each statute requires proof of an additional fact which the other does not, an acquittal or conviction under either statute does not exempt the defendant from prosecution and punishment under the other.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.