Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 KAN 1002 - State v. Robinson

State v. Robinson’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
1
states following
January 2025
most recently cited

84 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Wong Sun v. United States · Crawford v. Washington · Rakas v. Illinois · Davis v. Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'(1) is arbitrary, fanciful, or unreasonable, i.e. , if no reasonable person would have taken the view adopted by the trial court; (2) is based on an error of law, i.e. , if the discretion is guided by an erroneous legal conclusion; or (3) is based on an error of fact, i.e. , if substantial competent evidence does not support a factual finding on which a prerequisite conclusion of law or the exercise of discretion is based.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'extends criminal liability to a person other than the principal actor.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “aid a pathologist in explaining the cause of death.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.