Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 Kan. 1057 - State v. King

State v. King’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

2 district · 10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · United States v. Dunn · State v. Ward · State v. Ivory · State v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “violates a criminal defendant's fundamental right to a fair trial if the court excludes relevant, admissible, and 29 noncumulative evidence that is an integral part of the theory of the defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.