Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 Kan. 267 - State v. Tahah

State v. Tahah’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
1
states following
February 2025
most recently cited

42 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Ward · Kansas v. Marsh · State v. King · State v. Pabst · State v. Tosh

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the test set forth in K.S.A. 22-3414(3) is not a theoretical one. Instead, it requires the trial judge, who has heard the evidence in the case, to determine whether there is 'some evidence which would reasonably justify a conviction.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “'speculations on collateral matters wholly devoid of probative value relative to who committed the [crime].'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “It is fundamental that prosecutors must not argue facts not in evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.