Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 Kan. 29 - State v. Roberts

State v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
January 2020
most recently cited

2 district · 19 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3731

Relies on United States v. Jorn · United States v. Scott · United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. · United States v. Wilson · Serfass v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “bars trying the case 'in a subsequent prosecution' if a first attempt '[w]as terminated by a final order or judgment, even if entered before trial, which required a determination inconsistent with any fact necessary to a conviction.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “consistent with the doctrine of res judicata, the order of dismissal would not be final until the opportunity for an appeal had expired or was exhausted; only then would the order have preclusive effect.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Jeopardy attaches only when a jury is impaneled and sworn or in a bench trial when the judge begins to receive evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.