State v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
23
cited by 23 later decisions
2
states following
January 2020
most recently cited
2 district · 19 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3731
Relies on United States v. Jorn · United States v. Scott · United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co. · United States v. Wilson · Serfass v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“bars trying the case 'in a subsequent prosecution' if a first attempt '[w]as terminated by a final order or judgment, even if entered before trial, which required a determination inconsistent with any fact necessary to a conviction.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Klaassen v. Atkinson“consistent with the doctrine of res judicata, the order of dismissal would not be final until the opportunity for an appeal had expired or was exhausted; only then would the order have preclusive effect.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Klaassen v. Atkinson“Jeopardy attaches only when a jury is impaneled and sworn or in a bench trial when the judge begins to receive evidence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Parry
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.