State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““ ‘The factual underpinnings of a decision on a motion to suppress are reviewed for substantial competent evidence and the ultimate legal conclusion drawn from those facts reviewed de novo.’ [Citations omitted.] This court does not reweigh evidence, assess the credibility of witnesses, or resolve conflicts in evidence. [Citation omitted.] It is die State’s burden to demonstrate that a challenged seizure or search was lawful, [citations omitted], as long as the defendant had a legitimate expectation of privacy protected by the Fourth Amendment. [Citations omitted.]’ ” State v. Johnson, 293 Kan. 959, 963 , 270 P.3d 1135 (2012).”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Campbell

2. “We generally refuse to consider an issue on appeal if it has not been raised in the district court.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Longoria