Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 Ky. 346 - Latta v. Brooks

Latta v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
3
states following
July 1969
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gnau v. Ackerman · Louisville N. R. Co. v. Vaughn · Rothenberger v. Powers Fuel, Feed, Transfer & Storage Co. · Juntti v. Oliver Iron Mining Co. · Fitzpatrick v. Rose Donahue Realty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * The question is, Does ordinary unslacked building lime fall within that category? We think nor. Lime is a common article of building material and is used generally in construction work. It is widely used also for whitewashing the exterior and interior of buildings and fences, and for sanitary purposes. It is practically harmless in its unslacked form, though it is apt to burn or irritate the human body if it comes in contact with it after the substance has been slacked or moistened. We think that we would be going far afield should we place ordinary, unslacked lime in the same category with turntables, engines, gunpowder, dynamite caps and gasoline tanks. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.