Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 Ky. 406 - Brauner v. Leutz

Brauner v. Leutz’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
6
states following
November 2005
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently November 2005 · most notably Arthur v. Standard Engineering Co. (1951), Haddad v. Louisville Gas & Electric Company (1970)

6 federal appellate · 21 state decisions

1101943195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Indian Refining Co. v. Mobley · Pettyjohn & Sons v. Basham · Wall v. F. W. Woolworth Co. · Brumfield v. Consolidated Coach Corporation · Baird v. Goldberg

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘The doctrine appears to be universal that a licensor owes no duty to a licensee to provide safe places or premises for the occupancy or use of his li-' censee, save and except to abstain from doing any intentional, wilful (and in some jurisdictions gross recldess) act endangering the safety of the licensee.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . Before negligence may give rise to a cause of action in favor of the one who is injured thereby there should first exist a duty on the part of the negligent one toward the injured one before a liability attaches. . . . ” Brauner v. Leutz, 293 Ky. 406 , 169 S.W.2d 4, 5 (1943).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.