Dotson's Adm'r v. Ferrell’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
February 1950
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rorvik v. North Pac. Lumber Co. · 98 Cal. App. 619 - Schuster v. Superior Court · Davis v. Morton · Reiff's Adm'r v. Com. Use and Benefit Phillips
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* '* * Under this authority we are of the opinion the cause should be remanded and the judgment and order of submission be set aside and the case continued to await the construction of the will by the court of Ohio. If such a construction cannot be obtained within a reasonable period of time, upon prpper showing to this effect, the chancellor will resubmit the, case for construction of the will without benefit of a decision by the Ohio courts. Neither the ancillary administrator, nor the-Kentucky creditors or distributees, will be prejudiced by this procedure.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.