Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 Ky. 808 - Thomas v. Dahl

Thomas v. Dahl’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

37
cited by 37 later decisions
1
states following
December 1972
most recently cited

37 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently December 1972 · most notably Vaughn v. Jones (1953), Baldwin v. Hosley (1959)

37 state decisions

1801943195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shuman v. Hall · Hopper v. Barren Fork Coal Co. · Barr v. Searcy · National Linen Supply Co. v. Snowden · Consolidated Coach Corp. v. Bryant

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The preferred driver (having the right of way) has .the right to assume, although not with implicit impunity, that the other driver about to enter his path of travel from a private driveway will yield to him; yet there remains the duty at all times to exercise reasonable care to avoid collision with other vehicles, and he cannot ignore their presence or possible presence. The duty to yield the right of way may depend upon whether the driver traveling at a lawful rate of speed is so close to the intersection that a prudent person under the circumstances would not have reasonable ground to believe he might safely enter the highway and would riot come within the zone of danger. The driver on the subordinate way or street is required to slow down or stop and let the vehicle on the superior way pass when their positions are such that a reasonably careful man might otherwise be in doubt as to which should go first.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.