293 Mich. App. 644 - State v. McQueen’s Empirical Analysis
2011
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2018
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he acquisition, possession, cultivation, manufacture, use, internal possession, delivery, transfer, or transportation of marihuana or paraphernalia relating to the administration of marihuana to treat or alleviate a registered qualifying patient's debilitating medical condition or symptoms associated with the debilitating medical condition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“medical use of marijuana is allowed under state law to the extent that it is carried out in accordance with the provisions of [the MMMA].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“The words of an initiative law are given their ordinary and customary meaning as would have been understood by the voters.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.