Klicker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
20 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 127 Cal. App. 2d 442 - City of Los Angeles v. Gage · Grant v. Mayor of Baltimore · Naegele Outdoor Advertising Co. of Minnesota, Inc. v. Village of Minnetonka · 1 Cal. 3d 875 - National Advertising Co. v. County of Monterey · Hoffmann v. Kinealy
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[Tjhis case comes to us on appeal without the benefit of a full evidentiary hearing. Such a hearing is necessary to develop requisite facts as a basis for deciding the constitutional issue. Without such a basis, we cannot rule on the constitutionality of a statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kager
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.