Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 N.C. 486 - State v. Batdorf

State v. Batdorf’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

84
cited by 84 later decisions
9
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

2 district · 82 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 84 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably State v. Blackwell (2006), 34 Cal. 4th 1039 - People v. Betts (2005)

2 district · 82 state decisions

23019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In the Matter of Samuel Winship · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Mullaney v. Wilbur · Green v. United States · Barnes v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 84 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he State must carry the burden and show beyond a reasonable doubt that North Carolina has jurisdiction to try the accused.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “When jurisdiction is challenged, the defendant is contesting the very power of this State to try him. We are of the view that a question as basic as jurisdiction is not an 'independent, distinct, substantive matter of exemption, immunity or defense' and ought not to be regarded as an affirmative defense on which the defendant must bear the burden of proof. Rather, jurisdiction is a matter which, when contested , should be proven by the prosecution as a prerequisite to the authority of the court to enter judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[T]he State, when jurisdiction is challenged, [is required] to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime with which defendant is charged occurred in North Carolina.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.