¶1Golding, Crews, Meekins, Gordan & Gray, for defendant.
¶2Rutledge & Pruett, Williams, Willeford, Boger & Grady, for plaintiff.
¶3Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 34 N.C.App. 1, 237 S.E.2d 259. Denied.
293 N.C. 593
239 S.E.2d 264
Thelma R. THOMPSON v. Dr. Charles R. LOCKERT.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided November 1, 1977.
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1977-11-01
Relies on 34 N.C. App. 1 - Thompson v. Lockert
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1977-11-01
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently December 2005 · most notably Wall v. Stout (1984), 142 N.C. App. 18 - Evans v. United Services Automobile Ass'n (2001)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1Golding, Crews, Meekins, Gordan & Gray, for defendant.
¶2Rutledge & Pruett, Williams, Willeford, Boger & Grady, for plaintiff.
¶3Petition by defendant for discretionary review under GS 7A-31, 34 N.C.App. 1, 237 S.E.2d 259. Denied.