State v. Goynes’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
17 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · Pennsylvania v. Finley · Miller v. Alabama · Murray v. Giarratano
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“unequivocally identifies one, and only one, date from which the 1-year limitation period is measured .... What Congress has said ... is clear: An applicant has one year from the date on which the right he asserts was initially recognized by this Court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Abrams v. Laughlin“As long as the conditions in the second clause are satisfied so that ( § 2255 (f) (3) ) applies in the first place, that (second) clause has no impact whatsoever on the date from which the ... limitation period ... begins to run.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Abrams v. Laughlin“one date and one date only as the date from which the ... limitation period runs: 'the date on which the right asserted was initially recognized by the Supreme Court.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Abrams v. Laughlin
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.