Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 NW2D 577 - Bierkamp v. Rogers

Bierkamp v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

46
cited by 46 later decisions
7
states following
May 2019
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 103 Ill. 2d 226 - People v. Tisler (1984), State v. Dukes (1988)

45 state decisions

2301980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc. · Hicks v. Miranda · McLaughlin v. Florida · McGinnis v. Royster · Silver v. Silver

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “All laws of a general nature shall have a uniform operation; the General Assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities, which, upon the same terms shall not equally belong to all citizens.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In point of fact, the presence or absence of a guest statute does not affect the decision of friends and relatives to ride together in an automobile. Drivers may hesitate to pick up hitchhikers, but not because of potential liability for negligence, ordinary or gross. Friends and relatives offer, seek, accept, or decline rides with each other for reasons quite apart from the ability to recover for negligently inflicted injury, death or loss. It is only after the fortuitous event of an accident that the existence of the statute becomes known to most people. The absence of a guest passenger statute would not chill hospitality or group transportation any more or less than its existence promotes such activity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “must negate every reasonable basis upon which the classification may be sustained.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.