Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

293 N.Y. 805

59 N.E.2d 175

People v. Schulz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1944

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1944-11-16

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently January 1960

2 state decisions

Relies on 7 E.H. Smith 90 - People v. . Nelson · People v. Wallace Company · People v. . Weinstock

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1944-11-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Order of Appellate Division reversed and judgment of Court of Special Sessions affirmed; no opinion.

¶2Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, LEWIS, DESMOND and THACHER, JJ.

¶3RIPPEY and CONWAY, JJ., dissent upon the ground that there is no prohibition, in the Alcoholic Beverage Control Law, of the act charged against the defendant and that such prohibition may not be implied. (People v. Wallace Company,282 N.Y. 417, 419;People v. Nelson,153 N.Y. 90, 94; People v. Weinstock,193 N.Y. 481, 485.)

/293/ny/805 · .json · Public domain