¶1 It was error for the trial court to charge, as a matter of law, that Katz was not an accomplice of the defendant. That was a question, on the record here presented, for the jury.
¶2 The judgments should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
¶3 Lehman, Ch. J., Lohghean, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacher, JJ., concur.
¶4 Judgments reversed, etc.