Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

293 N.Y. 889

59 N.E.2d 790

Dailey v. Gidinsky

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1944

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1944-12-30

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1944-12-30

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1969

3 state decisions

30194419501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 The final judgment should be modified by striking therefr'om the direction for payment to the plaintiff receiver of sums to be fixed by the court in which the receivership is pending. Whether such payment shall be made to the plaintiff receiver must be determined by the court which appointed him. (Civ. Prac. Act, §§ 804-a, 1547.) In all other respects, the judgments should be affirmed, with costs.

¶2 The judgments should be modified in accordance with this opinion and as so modified affirmed, with costs.

¶3 Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thachek, JJ., concur.

¶4 Judgment accordingly.

/293/ny/889 · .json · Public domain