Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 Or. 741 - State v. Caraher

State v. Caraher’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

74
cited by 74 later decisions
7
states following
December 2010
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 66 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 74 later decisions — most recently December 2010 · most notably Friedman v. Commissioner of Public Safety (1991), State v. Larocco (1990)

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 66 state decisions

3301982199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Robinson · United States v. Edwards · United States v. Schleis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 74 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"One of the protections derived from the Oregon Constitution includes a recognition that a valid custodial arrest does not alone give rise to a unique right to search." 293 Or. at 756 , 653 P.2d 942 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  2. “"These cases, Chinn, Krogness and O'Neal , have expanded the justification for a search incident to arrest beyond considerations of the officer's safety and destruction of evidence. They permit a search when it is relevant to the crime for which defendant is being arrested and so long as it is reasonable in light of all the facts. * * *"”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. ““No law shall violate the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable search, or seizure; and no warrant shall issue but upon probable cause, supported by oath, or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the person or thing to be seized.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.