Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 293 Or. App. 562 - State v. Swanson

293 Or. App. 562 - State v. Swanson’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kubik v. J & R Foods of Oregon, Inc. · State v. Wright · 31 Or. App. 1155 - State v. Nulph · State v. Schiller-Munneman · 223 Or. App. 444 - State v. Veatch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “trial court's ruling and the parties' arguments at trial and on appeal all assume that the trooper's testimony-that defendant initially refused to speak with the trooper without her attorney's advice-was a comment on defendant's invocation of a constitutionally protected right”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “is in the best position to assess the impact of the complained-of incident and to select the means (if any) necessary to correct any problem resulting from it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “no opinion as to whether defendant's constitutional right to counsel *** had attached when the trooper questioned her”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.