Washington v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1956
Citation profile
1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
November 1958
most recently cited
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 84 Okla. Crim. 97 - Sadler v. State · 18 Okla. Crim. 480 - Cheeves v. State · 97 Okla. Crim. 415 - Kidd v. State · 61 Okla. Crim. 352 - Armstrong v. State · De Armond v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The jury is the sole judge of the facts involving the guilt or innocence of the accused and when the record discloses facts, even though conflicting, which are sufficient to warrant the verdict the same will be sustained on appeal.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fox v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.